new jersey v tlo case brief

The Supreme Court restored the case to the calendar for reargument. 325 1985 Argued March 28 1984 Reargued October 2 1984 Decided January 15 1985 JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

New Jersey Vs Tlo Explained In Five Minutes Us History Review Youtube

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY No.

. 2d 720 1985 Brief Fact Summary. New Jersey v TLO Burger Court 469 US. School officials need not obtain a warrant before searching a student who is under their authority.

School officials searched her purse suspecting she had cigarettes. I On March 7 1980 a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County N. A New Jersey high school student was accused of violating school rules by smoking in the restroom leading an assistant principal to search her purse for cigarettes.

In a New Jersey high school a teacher found two girls smoking in the bathroom and took them to the principals office. This article examines New Jersey v. General Counsel submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey School Boards Association State in the Interest of TLO Paula A.

Detroit Board of Educ 431 US. The Court held that the Fourth Amendment to the US. 331 1983 463 A2d 934.

The State contended only that the remedial purposes of the exclusionary rule were not well served by. Constitution specifically its prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to. 209 1977 Abrams.

ERIC is an online library of education research and information sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences IES of the US. If you continue browsing the site you agree to the use of cookies on this website. 325 is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of reasonableness for searches of students conducted by public school officials in a school environment.

The two girls were caught by a teacher at the school. The principal demanded to see the girls purse and found evidence that she was also selling marijuana at school. Syllabus NEW JERSEY v.

In addition to the previously argued question the Court requested that the parties brief and argue the additional question of whether the assistant principal. The assistant vice principal Theodore Choplick questioned TLO. One girl admitted to smoking but the other known as TLO denied it.

The officials discovered cigarettes a small amount of marijuana and a list containing the names of students who owed TLO. Is a case about whether it is constitutional for a schools staff to search a students belongings without a warrant after she was caught smoking. STATE IN THE INTEREST OF TLO JUVENILE-APPELLANT.

Was a high school student. J discovered two girls smoking in a lavatory. STATE OF NEW JERSEY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v.

This case explores the legal concept of search and seizure. Was a high school student. Table of Cases Abington School Dist.

This case explores the legal concept of search and seizure. The vice principal discovered marijuana and other items that implicated the student in dealing marijuana which was illegal. The State contended only that the remedial purposes of the exclusionary rule were not well served by.

She was accused of. Defendant was discovered smoking in the bathroom at the high school with a friend. Synopsis of Rule of Law.

Was charged with possession of marijuana. About the smoking and TLO. View Notes - Case Brief - New Jersey v TLO from HISTORY AP Governm at Park View High.

The vice-principal of a school searched a students bag and found evidence that she was dealing marijuana. Argued March 28 1984-Reargued October 2 1984-Decided January 15 1985 A teacher at a New Jersey high school upon discovering respondent then a 14-year-old freshman and her companion smoking cigarettes in a. TLO a 1984 case in which the Supreme Court recognized for the first time that the fourth amendment prohibits unreasonable searches of students and their possessions by public school officials.

New Jersey v. After the original oral argument in March of 1984 the Supreme Court restored the case to the calendar for reargument. Initials are used for minors was a 14-year-old high school student.

New Jersey V T L O By Karmel Tanner 2d 720 1985 Brief Fact Summary. When this case was first argued last Term the State conceded for the purpose of argument that the standard devised by the New Jersey Supreme Court for determining the legality of school searches was appropriate and that the court had correctly applied that standard. When this case was first argued last Term the State conceded for the purpose of argument that the standard devised by the New Jersey Supreme Court for determining the legality of school searches was appropriate and that the court had correctly applied that standard.

63 decision for New Jerseymajority opinion by Byron R. 203 1963 Abood v. A 14-year-old freshman high school student TLO.

Facts of the case. Start studying New Jersey v TLO. One of the two girls was the respondent T.

The vice-principal of a school searched a students bag and found evidence that she was dealing marijuana. State in Interest of TLO Annotate this Case. Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

Learn vocabulary terms and more with flashcards games and other study tools. New Jersey V T L O Powerpoint SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance and to provide you with relevant advertising.

New Jersey V T L O By Sarah Grimsley

New Jersey V Tlo Trevor B Akilia R Facts About The Case In 1980 A Teacher At Piscataway In Nj Discovered Two Girl Smoking In A Restroom This Was Ppt Download